+1 973-826-7406|info@avadasoftware.com

Avada Software Logo
See a Live Demo

AVADA SOFTWARE WILL BE AT IBM THINK 2019, FEBRUARY 12th-15th, SAN FRANCISCO, CA

To schedule a meeting with us, Contact Us!

For more information on IBM THINK, Click Here.

By |2019-01-21T21:14:19-05:00January 21st, 2019|Conferences & Events|

About the Author:

Related Posts

Going to IBM TechXchange 2026? Make Time for the MQ User Group
Going to IBM TechXchange 2026? Make Time for the MQ User Group
Gallery

Going to IBM TechXchange 2026? Make Time for the MQ User Group

Join Avada Software at the IBM MQ User Group, TechXchange 2025
Join Avada Software at the IBM MQ User Group, TechXchange 2025
Gallery

Join Avada Software at the IBM MQ User Group, TechXchange 2025

Avada Software Is Sponsoring Middleware Mash-Up 2025
Avada Software Is Sponsoring Middleware Mash-Up 2025
Gallery

Avada Software Is Sponsoring Middleware Mash-Up 2025

Avada Software Celebrates IBM MQ’s 30th Anniversary
Avada Software Celebrates IBM MQ’s 30th Anniversary
Gallery

Avada Software Celebrates IBM MQ’s 30th Anniversary

Middleware Mash-Up Dallas Recap

Middleware Mash-Up Dallas Recap

AVADA SOFTWARE AT A GLANCE

Avada Software’s flagship product, Infrared360®, is an IT management portal providing total administration, monitoring, testing, auditing, analytics dashboards, and self-service for cloud, on-prem, or hybrid environments. Get secure, collaborative management of elements across your IT stack like Kafka®, IBM® MQ, IBM® ACE/IIB, ActiveMQ®, WebSphere®, JBoss®, and Tomcat® Application Servers, URLs, SOAP & REST-based web services, IBM® DataPower® and MQ Appliance.

Latest Insight

The Middleware Blog

August 5th, 2026|

REST APIs are changing how teams manage enterprise middleware. For IBM MQ teams, that can be a very good thing. REST and Swagger-style API documentation make it easier to script common actions, integrate with change systems, reduce manual work, and give operations teams faster ways to interact with MQ environments.

But there is a catch.

The question is not simply, “Can we manage IBM MQ through REST APIs?” The better question is:

“Can […]

Read More

August 3rd, 2026|

Confluent Message Browser vs. Infrared360: Two Protobuf Inspection Workflows This is Part 4 of a 5-part series exploring The Protobuf Visibility Gap in Kafka Operations | Previous Article | Next Article A useful product comparison starts by acknowledging the overlap. Confluent Cloud’s message browser and Confluent Platform Control Center can display, filter, validate, download, and produce Kafka messages. They support schema-based workflows […]

Read More

July 15th, 2026|

A practical evaluation guide for MQ engineers comparing monitoring and administration platforms

If you are evaluating an IBM MQ monitoring and administration solution, you probably do not need another tool that only displays queue depth. You need a faster and safer way to see what is happening across the MQ estate, investigate incidents, take approved action, share the right level of visibility with other teams, and retain evidence of what […]

Read More

July 13th, 2026|

Why Risk and Operations Teams Inspect Business Values Inside Kafka Records This is Part 3 of a 5-part series exploring The Protobuf Visibility Gap in Kafka Operations | Previous Article | Next Article A risk or operations team does not inspect Kafka message content merely because the technology makes it possible. The team inspects content when the business needs evidence that a […]

Read More

July 10th, 2026|

IBM MQ Appliance M2004: What MQ Teams Should Know About the New Release IBM has announced the IBM MQ Appliance M2004, a new hardware model designed to support higher messaging performance, modern memory architecture, and expanded network connectivity for enterprise MQ environments. [1]

For MQ teams managing high-volume messaging, business-critical workloads, and resilient infrastructure, this release is worth reviewing as part of future capacity planning, modernization, and appliance lifecycle strategy. […]

Read More

July 9th, 2026|

Kafka Monitoring Can Show the Symptom. Protobuf Record Inspection Can Reveal the Cause This is Part 2 of a 5-part series exploring The Protobuf Visibility Gap in Kafka Operations | Previous Article | Next Article Kafka operations teams depend on monitoring because distributed streaming systems can fail in many ways. Brokers can become unavailable, partitions can lose preferred leaders, consumers can lag, […]

Read More

We are proud supporters of:

Avada Software. All Rights Reserved |This website may contain logos and trademarks of third parties. These are the property of their respective owners and are used on this site for informational purposes only. Avada Software does not claim any ownership or association with these trademarks or, except where explicitly stated, their respective organizations. | Privacy Policy
Go to Top